90
90
Mar 15, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 90
favorite 0
quote 0
what can you do to change this? ensured that it fans of the media to start with, but there is a bright spot and if i could disagree with the advisory little bit, are probably on life support, but not totally dead in the journalism world yet. ray bourge another new places are cropping up. the washington guardian are coming back in those places give us the best opportunity to get the truth that god and i start questions that used to be asked why sam donaldson of reagan days. we need people that are worried about the next moment, what we are going to tweet in five minutes, but what the truth needs to be. if you see those places get behind them, support them. if your children thinking journalism is the last days ago, encouraged that could be an honorable profession. you have a place where you put your money. if you read and subscribe to publications, you have the way to go with your pocketbook come over you advertise and subscribe. there's an opportunity to begin to send a message to my profession that it's time to clea
what can you do to change this? ensured that it fans of the media to start with, but there is a bright spot and if i could disagree with the advisory little bit, are probably on life support, but not totally dead in the journalism world yet. ray bourge another new places are cropping up. the washington guardian are coming back in those places give us the best opportunity to get the truth that god and i start questions that used to be asked why sam donaldson of reagan days. we need people that...
99
99
Mar 19, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 99
favorite 0
quote 0
it reforms entitlement, protecting everybody over 55 for many changes and makes changes so that younger people will still have these programs. it takes all the welfare programs, 185 different welfare programs and block grants the largest and most expensive ones just as clinton did with aid to families with children. we have this reform of entitlement and reform of these welfare programs and tax reform taking the top rate on individuals to 25% and the bottom rate to 10%. now we go from 10 up to 44 and the corporate rate which is 35% right now. the average in europe is 25 so we compete internationally. we tax our companies and our manufacturing companies more harshly than they do theirs. we want to take that rate to 25. i would rather be better than europe and the canadians are at 17%. i preferred the canadian rate than the european average so the republicans and democrats in their two budgets really show who they are. there is also a third budget which is the congressional budget which is more liberal democrats and they do massive new taxes on top of the ones i discussed. you have a sens
it reforms entitlement, protecting everybody over 55 for many changes and makes changes so that younger people will still have these programs. it takes all the welfare programs, 185 different welfare programs and block grants the largest and most expensive ones just as clinton did with aid to families with children. we have this reform of entitlement and reform of these welfare programs and tax reform taking the top rate on individuals to 25% and the bottom rate to 10%. now we go from 10 up to...
75
75
Mar 8, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 75
favorite 0
quote 0
the method does not change the law. the president sworn an oath to uphold the constitution and is bound by the law, whether the lethal force in question is a drone strike or a gunshot. the constitution applies the same way. and that's why i think there's been a great deal of confusion about the technology here when the technology is irrelevant to what the law in the constitution says, and the president is bound by the constitution, bound by the laws, and is sworn to uphold them. >> so, when you've said he would never -- you're saying there are no circumstances, because i thought that -- the attorney general talked about a 9/11 or peril -- >> you can make wild hypotheticals. they don't change the law for the president to uphold the united states, sworn to protect the united states, and in an event like an attack like pearl harbor, or 9/11, obviously the president has the constitutional authority to take action to prevent those kinds of attacks, but that has nothing to do with the technology used to prevent those attacks.
the method does not change the law. the president sworn an oath to uphold the constitution and is bound by the law, whether the lethal force in question is a drone strike or a gunshot. the constitution applies the same way. and that's why i think there's been a great deal of confusion about the technology here when the technology is irrelevant to what the law in the constitution says, and the president is bound by the constitution, bound by the laws, and is sworn to uphold them. >> so,...
59
59
Mar 13, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 59
favorite 0
quote 0
changed since a year ago. we hope to meet our mission responsibilities today. but the pathway we are on is creating risk and our ability to execute it. i look forward to working with the committee in congress on these difficult and complex challenges and i will carry back your message of appreciation for the men and women that we are privileged to associate with and i look forward to your questions. >> thank you, general kehler. general alexander? >> thank you, chairman carl levin and the ranking member and members of congress. it is a tremendous honor to work with and for general bob kehler. he has been so supportive of everything that we are trying to do and cybercommand. he is the only one that is nice to me and an intelligence officer. [laughter] you know, eight gives me great pleasure to talk about great things we're doing we are doing and cybercommand and address some of these questions that you put on the table. i will try to answer some of them. i cannot answer all of them today. the role of the defens
changed since a year ago. we hope to meet our mission responsibilities today. but the pathway we are on is creating risk and our ability to execute it. i look forward to working with the committee in congress on these difficult and complex challenges and i will carry back your message of appreciation for the men and women that we are privileged to associate with and i look forward to your questions. >> thank you, general kehler. general alexander? >> thank you, chairman carl levin...
77
77
Mar 22, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 77
favorite 0
quote 0
changed behavior from lower rates, for instance. back in 2003 the capital gains tax as you know was reduced and so what did they say? the joint committee on taxation and c.b.o. said that means because you've lowered the rate of taxation that you're going to get less revenue, right, because you have less taxes coming in? no, because they lowered the revenue, there was more economic activity. we got more revenue in. and so in 2007 they said revenues were is going to go down. revenues shot up. the same thing happened by the way back in 199, the last time this congress had a unified, balanced budget when bill clinton was president and he worked with the republican congress to get some of the spending under control, as we talked about earlier, but also they cut the capital gains rate and lowe an lo and behold, lotsy showed up on the revenue side. the dynamic score, the macroecomonic scoring showed that was going to happen but the static score didn't. so as we begin to form yo formut kind of scoring we should do, wouldn't it be great if w
changed behavior from lower rates, for instance. back in 2003 the capital gains tax as you know was reduced and so what did they say? the joint committee on taxation and c.b.o. said that means because you've lowered the rate of taxation that you're going to get less revenue, right, because you have less taxes coming in? no, because they lowered the revenue, there was more economic activity. we got more revenue in. and so in 2007 they said revenues were is going to go down. revenues shot up. the...
162
162
Mar 7, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 162
favorite 0
quote 1
what changes to the c.i.a. review process will you put in place or have you attempted to put in place in your previous role to prevent further unintentional killing of u.s. citizens? who role will you play in approving the drone strike? what role did you play in approving the drone strike that led to the death of underage citizen, anwar al-alwaki? unlike his father, he has not renounced his u.s. citizenship. was this younger man the intended target of the u.s. drone strike which took his life? further, do you reject the subsequent plane apparently originating from anonymous u.s. government sources? always a concern when you hear anonymous u.s. government sources. that the young man had actually been a, quote, a military age male of 20 years or more of age, something later proven false by the release of his birth certificate? senator paul goes on in the letter, "do you believe the inadvertent killing of civilians and anger from local populations should cause us to limit rather than expand the drone question?" th
what changes to the c.i.a. review process will you put in place or have you attempted to put in place in your previous role to prevent further unintentional killing of u.s. citizens? who role will you play in approving the drone strike? what role did you play in approving the drone strike that led to the death of underage citizen, anwar al-alwaki? unlike his father, he has not renounced his u.s. citizenship. was this younger man the intended target of the u.s. drone strike which took his life?...
77
77
Mar 21, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 77
favorite 0
quote 0
but the test of whether the rights have been violated have changed from since technology changes. for more than 40 years, after that the inquiry has been whether an individual has reasonable expectations of privacy that has been
but the test of whether the rights have been violated have changed from since technology changes. for more than 40 years, after that the inquiry has been whether an individual has reasonable expectations of privacy that has been
76
76
Mar 30, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
i think that can happen on so many matters you're trying to change. >> host: mr. robinson, why did you not accept the honorary degree from georgetown university that you were offered? >> guest: because -- >> host: you planned on getting? >> guest: i got there that day, george -- what's his name? >> host: tenet. >> guest: tenet. i opened the paper that morning, found out that i had come all the way up from the caribbean to accept it. i was depply honored -- deeply honored. a black member of the georgetown administration had worked so hard to make this possible, and i was profoundly honored. i got up that night and opened the paper to see that george tenet was to be honored. he was, of course, instrumental in making this illegal and immoral war in iraq, the blitzkrieg of bombing and thinking about the innocent civilians underneath all those bombs that lit up the night when the war against iraq was opened. and the justification of a spate of lies before the united nations to make this possible fig leaf of security council cover was outrageous and despicable on my par
i think that can happen on so many matters you're trying to change. >> host: mr. robinson, why did you not accept the honorary degree from georgetown university that you were offered? >> guest: because -- >> host: you planned on getting? >> guest: i got there that day, george -- what's his name? >> host: tenet. >> guest: tenet. i opened the paper that morning, found out that i had come all the way up from the caribbean to accept it. i was depply honored --...
63
63
Mar 1, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 63
favorite 0
quote 0
change but cms characterized the change as a, quote, restatement and clarifies, unquote, of existing policy in place since 2001. and it's attempt at enter operation cms determined the policy required a physician privileged by the hospital provide supervision and be physically present in the same job patient departments at all times when historically that has not been the practice. i'm concerned that cmss, quote, clarification is instead a significant change in medicare policy that would place considerable burden on hospitals, especially facilities in rural areas, and i'm also concerned the panel to convene to advise on the issue is not considering input from real critical access hospitals mitchell question is will you agree to return the pre2009 interpretation of this policy? >> in 2009 you're correct the cms made what we call policy clarifications but the critical access hospital community interpreted as fundamental changes. we heard a lot of concerns, a lot of complaints. in 2010, i traveled through north dakota, not south dakota but north dakota to meet first hand with critical ac
change but cms characterized the change as a, quote, restatement and clarifies, unquote, of existing policy in place since 2001. and it's attempt at enter operation cms determined the policy required a physician privileged by the hospital provide supervision and be physically present in the same job patient departments at all times when historically that has not been the practice. i'm concerned that cmss, quote, clarification is instead a significant change in medicare policy that would place...
90
90
Mar 16, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 90
favorite 0
quote 0
the change is not made, so there was a mistake they are not making the change immediately. and there is a missed opportunity there to also have interpreted that as a sign of something we didn't see at the time. >> in a later e-mail you said we n credit credit inew set of the current csl one will be replaced with something more sensible and granular. mr. bacon, there are firmwide this climate at jpmorgan. is that true? >> yes. >> with his breeches ignored? >> now, the breaches were not at lord. specifically the one i expect you are referring to add a firmwide level was not ignored. it caused action escalation. it was a situation where we relied upon the explanation that turned out to be wrong about the new model, and the flotation agreed by the risk management in place at the time by multiple review, all of which failed, but was erroneously placed on may. >> let me tell you it's hard to explain to my constituents when their tax dollars are ensuring their edits. they're going to ask, how could we possibly do when to $6 billion loss and basically there is not only ignoring the
the change is not made, so there was a mistake they are not making the change immediately. and there is a missed opportunity there to also have interpreted that as a sign of something we didn't see at the time. >> in a later e-mail you said we n credit credit inew set of the current csl one will be replaced with something more sensible and granular. mr. bacon, there are firmwide this climate at jpmorgan. is that true? >> yes. >> with his breeches ignored? >> now, the...
90
90
Mar 27, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 90
favorite 0
quote 1
that would have changed. i think that that would change so much. >> paid maternity leave. that would be nice. it's going to have to come through private companies because the government is gone to -- is not going to be able to do it. we can't wait for marching on washington. we have to work on companies. i think there is enough pressure if young women coalesce in a new movement towards that i think that that can happen. there is a lot of precedent in the companies like google that expanded to 12 weeks, i think 12 weeks of paid maternity leave because they had too many women that were leaving. well, that's what happens. and once they got -- the improved the rate and it is paying off for them. >> her name is in the air already, talk about cheryl already and what she has been attracting because when we talk about how to solve these problems there are women ceos that have stepped forward and she has received a kind of astonishing amount of vitriol. on one level -- and i've written about this recently on the one level we want more women ceos. we kind of hate the women ceos that
that would have changed. i think that that would change so much. >> paid maternity leave. that would be nice. it's going to have to come through private companies because the government is gone to -- is not going to be able to do it. we can't wait for marching on washington. we have to work on companies. i think there is enough pressure if young women coalesce in a new movement towards that i think that that can happen. there is a lot of precedent in the companies like google that...